Town Square

Post a New Topic

Parents quiz experts on new teaching and testing method

Original post made on Feb 6, 2014

Parents last week got a taste of what their kids will be learning in a new educational model known as Common Core State Standards.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, February 6, 2014, 7:45 AM

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by Member name
a resident of Del Prado
on Feb 6, 2014 at 8:30 am

Some kids just don't do well in the testing mode period...This will eliminate having to cram to remember facts that under pressure a child could very easily panic and go blank for the answers. Lets hope this eliminates this situation too ???

Like this comment
Posted by Sirena
a resident of Val Vista
on Feb 6, 2014 at 10:10 am

Bunch of nonsense!!! My daughter read a small book on Japanesse interment and she was asked why. The answer her teacher gave as an example was way different from mine. You can't compare the standards of the 1940's to today's standards. It is all about interpetation. How can you grade an interpertation in middle school about WWII when you have only read a 4 page paper? In part, histoy is taught so we won't make the same mistakes as in the past. Math is taught in such a difficult way, that I have to re-teach her so that she understands. End results the same, but far less steps. Hopefully parents will get involved in their childrens homework, so they can make a intelligent decision regarding common core.

Like this comment
Posted by Guest
a resident of another community
on Feb 6, 2014 at 10:31 am

I skimmed through this article but from being a teacher myself, new textbooks will have to made in order to keep teachers from going insane.

"As an example, she said a teacher might read a story about bats to an elementary school class, then move into bat biology, giving students informational texts as they need them."

What California biology textbook has a whole section on bats? None that I'm aware of. These new common core standards are somewhat the exact same as the old ones, except there are some additions that will no doubt place more work on teaches and students. It will be interesting to see how these new standards will raise (if they even will) students' writing skills.

Like this comment
Posted by Ben
a resident of Birdland
on Feb 6, 2014 at 11:08 am

You know what? The more I looked into it, like all things that are sinister, it’s packed in a nice, little box with a pretty little bow on top, but once you untie the bow, and start unpacking these so-called federal educational standards, you realize it’s all a pack of a lies.
It’s like a magician: In the right hand, he’s holding these sparkling uniform standards that will purportedly level the playing field. But in his left hand and behind his back, he’s holding the other components of this total education initiative. If it were simply standards, it would just be unconstitutional, but not horrible. But it’s so much more, and it’s the so much more that is truly horrible.
The government will tell you there is no central database that is part-and-parcel of Common Core, but that’s an outright lie. They're tracking over 400 data points, from parents’ political and religious affiliations to how much money they make, what the child eats, behaviors and attitudes toward sex…everything.
Of course its all tied to this administration giving out money if you implement it. Bribery in its truest form. And another way to collect data on its citizens.

Like this comment
Posted by MAF
a resident of Donlon Elementary School
on Feb 8, 2014 at 8:07 am

My son has ADD and Dyslexia- This common core way is not the best way to test him. Even with the "special needs" modifications. Please speak with experts in the area of ADD and Dyslexia to best help these children's needs.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

New state housing requirements could affect Pleasanton
By Jeb Bing | 6 comments | 635 views

Salami, Salami … Baloney
By Tom Cushing | 23 comments | 457 views

Time for new collaboration between city and school district
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 429 views