Over the top yearbook photo can run | December 7, 2012 | Pleasanton Weekly | PleasantonWeekly.com |


https://pleasantonweekly.com/print/story/print/2012/12/07/over-the-top-yearbook-photo-can-run


Pleasanton Weekly

News - December 7, 2012

Over the top yearbook photo can run

Senior picture originally banned by Amador principal

by Glenn Wohltmann

An Amador Valley High senior will be allowed to have his distinctive photo in the school's yearbook after all.

This story contains 236 words.

Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.

If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.

Log in     Subscribe

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Melanie
a resident of Pleasanton Heights
on May 14, 2013 at 10:35 pm

Why not his mug shot in the yearbook instead. What a punk.


Like this comment
Posted by Steve
a resident of Stoneridge
on May 14, 2013 at 11:42 pm

If it isn't the United Nations coming into our town with blue helmets and bicycles, it's the ACLU trying to turn us all into Mohawk wearing zombies. We're only a breath or two away from being like Communist China.


Like this comment
Posted by Some Dude
a resident of Beratlis Place
on May 15, 2013 at 6:18 am

Why has the editor reposted this December 7 article? Trying to stir things up on the forum now that the special election is over and things have quieted down? For shame!


Like this comment
Posted by nancy s.
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 15, 2013 at 7:02 am

I agree with Melanie, use his mugshot. Glenn, how about updating us with what has happened with his case instead of rerunning a 5 month old story. It drives me nuts you guys never follow up on some of the stories you post.


Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on May 15, 2013 at 10:19 am

Have a few of the posters forgotten about FREE SPEECH and what it means? duh...


Like this comment
Posted by excon
a resident of Livermore
on May 16, 2013 at 9:20 am

cholo is so right...mugshots are in the public domain and posting them would be considered free speech. Post the mug shots (the punk from Amador, not cholo's).


Like this comment
Posted by "member"
a resident of Carriage Gardens
on May 23, 2013 at 5:45 pm

FREE SPEECH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!