Specifically, the request that the lawsuit be dismissed questions claims surrounding a Jan. 16 traffic stop by Martens.
"The stop resulted in a search of the Plaintiff's car, but the complaint does not tell us why," the dismissal motions states. "This search resulted in contraband being found, but the Complaint does not tell us what, or where. Martens is alleged to have arrested the Plaintiff following this search; but the complaint doesn't tell us what the Plaintiff was arrested for."
The rebuttal offers a half dozen reasons for the suit to be dismissed, and cites federal and state law, although much of its argument seems to be about gaps in the original suit.
The request for dismissal also cites as a precedent a federal ruling stemming from a lawsuit filed by one of the men held in the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.
The suit is set for a Dec. 18 hearing in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.
This story contains 213 words.
Stories older than 90 days are available only to subscribing members. Please help sustain quality local journalism by becoming a subscribing member today.
If you are already a subscriber, please log in so you can continue to enjoy unlimited access to stories and archives. Subscriptions start at $5 per month and may be cancelled at any time.