Letters to the Editor | January 3, 2014 | Pleasanton Weekly | PleasantonWeekly.com |

Pleasanton Weekly

Opinion - January 3, 2014

Letters to the Editor

Clarification needed for predator statistics

Dear Editor,

In your predator article on p.7 of the Dec. 27, 2013 issue of the Pleasanton Weekly, you stated that Pleasanton has the fewest predators per capita in Alameda County (32 total: 28 on Megan's List + 4 for police eyes only). I checked the Megan's Law website, and I only found 22 names listed. Also, I found that Dublin only has 8; Danville has 4; and San Ramon 10. I think these figures are more telling than stating that Pleasanton has the lowest per capita rate. Knowing the figures of the cities close to us, or cities we compare Pleasanton to, gives a whole different interpretation to the data you provided. With Dublin's population of almost 49,000 and Pleasanton's just over 72,000, I can only conclude that either Dublin must have a large amount of predators whose info can only be seen by the police or your figures are off. Maybe some clarification would help.

C. Fasulo


There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields