News

Cities cancel elections as districting may limit challengers

Danville (which is still at-large) among those to just reappoint incumbents who were only candidates to file, rather than hold an election

The Bay Area is home to two of the nation's three most powerful politicians in Vice President Kamala Harris and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. It's one of the most politically involved regions in the U.S. and is credited as the birthplace of the modern Free Speech Movement.

So why can't it find enough people to run for its city councils?

At least five Bay Area cities have canceled entire or partial city council elections this year because of a lack of candidates, opting to appoint the only people filing. Danville, Lafayette, Hillsborough, Mill Valley and Cotati canceled their whole council elections.

"Municipalities have the ability, per the elections code, to cancel their contest if less than or the exact number of candidates have filed for the available seats," said Dan Miller, who manages candidate filing for the Marin County Elections Department. "This doesn't happen often, but it's not unusual."

Local election officials say the movement from at-large elections (where the highest vote-getters win, regardless of address) to district elections (in which one person represents select neighborhoods based on geography or interest) is the root cause of elections being canceled.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

City council districts used to be for bigger cities like San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland. The landscape started changing after the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 was passed.

The law says at-large elections are discriminatory if they impair the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence an election. But the law doesn't force cities to switch.

"Most jurisdictions do that of their own volition, to avoid lawsuits," said Jim Irizarry, the assistant chief election officer of San Mateo County. "More people are accusing discrimination in at-large elections."

The 2001 law gives underrepresented groups living in the same part of a city the ability to elect someone they feel represents their interests.

"As districts split into smaller sub-districts (trustee or council areas), there may be less competition for each seat as the pool of potential candidates gets smaller," said John Gardner, the assistant registrar of voters for Solano County. "We've observed this pattern in 2018 and 2020 local contests as more districts moved to additional split districts vs. at-large contests."

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

District elections can dramatically alter the local political landscape. For example, instead of one council election, Redwood City now has seven.

The flip side is saving money. Danville saved an estimated $64,000 to $96,000 by reappointing its two council members up for reelection this year. Lafayette saved between $38,000 and $57,000, according to a staff report.

Napa is also without challengers for its two open spots, but still chose to go ahead with the election in November.

"They could've canceled the election," said John Tuteur, the Napa County Registrar of Voters. "It will cost them about $80,000 to put the two unopposed incumbents on the ballot."

"We did it for a couple reasons," said Napa City Councilmember Bernie Narvaez. "People still get to vote, or not vote. I don't want to remove that right of a person to vote. And (if there's no election) then we'd have two appointed council members. They should be elected."

With no challengers, Woodside also could've canceled this year's council election, as it has only incumbents running for two open seats.

"They reelecting to have candidates on the ballot because they want to offer the chance for write-in candidates," said Irizarry.

While cities like Suisun City (the mayoral race has no challengers) and Watsonville (three out of four districts had one candidate file) didn't completely cancel elections, council spots are going to the only people running in their district.

Napa went to district elections in 2020. Narvarez said previous discrimination lawsuits against cities without district voting were "a trigger point."

"But it does bring more equity to the election process," said Narvaez, who considers himself part of the Latinx community. "It's more of a focus-based election, though I think there's still a learning curve."

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Looking for more Livermore stories? The Livermore Vine will be your new source of vital news and information. Sign up to be among the first to get our daily local news headlines sent to your inbox for free.

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

Cities cancel elections as districting may limit challengers

Danville (which is still at-large) among those to just reappoint incumbents who were only candidates to file, rather than hold an election

by Tony Hicks / BCN Foundation /

Uploaded: Sun, Sep 18, 2022, 4:24 pm

The Bay Area is home to two of the nation's three most powerful politicians in Vice President Kamala Harris and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. It's one of the most politically involved regions in the U.S. and is credited as the birthplace of the modern Free Speech Movement.

So why can't it find enough people to run for its city councils?

At least five Bay Area cities have canceled entire or partial city council elections this year because of a lack of candidates, opting to appoint the only people filing. Danville, Lafayette, Hillsborough, Mill Valley and Cotati canceled their whole council elections.

"Municipalities have the ability, per the elections code, to cancel their contest if less than or the exact number of candidates have filed for the available seats," said Dan Miller, who manages candidate filing for the Marin County Elections Department. "This doesn't happen often, but it's not unusual."

Local election officials say the movement from at-large elections (where the highest vote-getters win, regardless of address) to district elections (in which one person represents select neighborhoods based on geography or interest) is the root cause of elections being canceled.

City council districts used to be for bigger cities like San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland. The landscape started changing after the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 was passed.

The law says at-large elections are discriminatory if they impair the ability of a protected class to elect candidates of its choice or otherwise influence an election. But the law doesn't force cities to switch.

"Most jurisdictions do that of their own volition, to avoid lawsuits," said Jim Irizarry, the assistant chief election officer of San Mateo County. "More people are accusing discrimination in at-large elections."

The 2001 law gives underrepresented groups living in the same part of a city the ability to elect someone they feel represents their interests.

"As districts split into smaller sub-districts (trustee or council areas), there may be less competition for each seat as the pool of potential candidates gets smaller," said John Gardner, the assistant registrar of voters for Solano County. "We've observed this pattern in 2018 and 2020 local contests as more districts moved to additional split districts vs. at-large contests."

District elections can dramatically alter the local political landscape. For example, instead of one council election, Redwood City now has seven.

The flip side is saving money. Danville saved an estimated $64,000 to $96,000 by reappointing its two council members up for reelection this year. Lafayette saved between $38,000 and $57,000, according to a staff report.

Napa is also without challengers for its two open spots, but still chose to go ahead with the election in November.

"They could've canceled the election," said John Tuteur, the Napa County Registrar of Voters. "It will cost them about $80,000 to put the two unopposed incumbents on the ballot."

"We did it for a couple reasons," said Napa City Councilmember Bernie Narvaez. "People still get to vote, or not vote. I don't want to remove that right of a person to vote. And (if there's no election) then we'd have two appointed council members. They should be elected."

With no challengers, Woodside also could've canceled this year's council election, as it has only incumbents running for two open seats.

"They reelecting to have candidates on the ballot because they want to offer the chance for write-in candidates," said Irizarry.

While cities like Suisun City (the mayoral race has no challengers) and Watsonville (three out of four districts had one candidate file) didn't completely cancel elections, council spots are going to the only people running in their district.

Napa went to district elections in 2020. Narvarez said previous discrimination lawsuits against cities without district voting were "a trigger point."

"But it does bring more equity to the election process," said Narvaez, who considers himself part of the Latinx community. "It's more of a focus-based election, though I think there's still a learning curve."

Comments

There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.