News

Secretive petition removes Natarajan from Dublin school board; special election to follow

Candidacy period now open for Trustee Area 4 residents to qualify for June 4 ballot

A group of Dublin voters successfully petitioned to cancel the school district’s provisional appointment of Nini Natarajan to the Board of Trustees, setting the stage for a special election for Trustee Area 4 residents in June.

The board selected Natarajan in December, following open recruitment that yielded only one other applicant, to fill the remainder of the term left vacant when elected trustee Joe Giannini resigned for personal reasons two months earlier.

But Natarajan was removed from the position on Friday after four meetings on the board when Alameda County election officials confirmed sufficient signatures had been submitted in a citizens’ petition demanding county Superintendent of Schools L. Karen Monroe terminate the appointment and call a special election instead.

“We thank Ms. Natarajan for her commitment to the community and desire to serve as a trustee,” Dublin Unified School District Superintendent Leslie Boozer said in a statement late Friday.

The reasons for the petition are not known.

Monroe’s Office of Education has declined to release the petition -- saying under the law it is a confidential document and therefore cannot be shared with the public. Petition proponents have not revealed themselves publicly, and their motivation is unclear.

Natarajan had not responded to requests for comment as of Monday afternoon. She would be eligible to register as a candidate to appear on the ballot for the June 4 special election.

DUSD Board President Amy Miller expressed disappointment in the petition proponents pursuing a special election.

“While I respect the process and the right of our community to pursue this course of action, we have a successful history of appointing board members in Dublin,” Miller said in a statement. “Regardless of the outcome, this challenge, and the associated special election, will cost the district tens of thousands of dollars that would be better spent on our students.”

The Dublin board had appointed Natarajan in a 3-1 vote on Dec. 11 to fill the board vacancy following a public recruitment and consideration process that drew two applicants and little public intrigue at the time.

The board opted for direct appointment, rather than call a special election at the time, to serve as a provisional trustee until December 2020, when Giannini’s elected term was due to expire. Giannini had resigned abruptly Oct. 22 after just under two years on the board, citing the time commitment and fractious Dublin politics creating a hostile service environment.

Natarajan, a finance professional and parent volunteer focused on helping provide a balanced approach to educating Dublin students, beat out 2016 school board candidate Gabrielle Blackman to earn the provisional appointment representing Area 4, a wide swath of land in the northeastern part of Dublin.

An India native who became a U.S. citizen in 2013, Natarajan was the first Indian-American woman to serve on the DUSD board.

However, state law provided residents 30 days after Natarajan’s appointment to challenge the board’s decision, and a petition was filed with Monroe’s office on Jan. 2.

The Alameda County Registrar of Voters’ Office was then tasked with confirming the petition contained the requisite amount of signatures to force the special election -- 1.5% of eligible voters in Area 4, which has 4,877 registered voters.

The count came back last Friday, with election officials finding 126 signatures of the 139 names were valid, well above the 74 signatures required.

As a result, Monroe officially terminated Natarajan’s appointment effective Friday and scheduled the special election for June 4. The DUSD board will proceed with four trustees until the election winner takes their seat.

Area 4 residents interested in running for the open seat must submit their completed candidacy papers to county election officials by 5 p.m. March 8 at the registrar’s office at the René C. Davidson Courthouse, 1225 Fallon St. Room G-1, in Oakland.

Candidates must be adults who live in DUSD Area 4, are registered to vote and are not legally precluded from holding civil office.

The June 4 ballot will be the first election for Area 4 residents since the district switched from at-large voting to district-based elections for trustee seats. Giannini was elected at-large and his seat later delegated to Area 4 when election boundaries were drawn.

At this point, it will also be the second special election in less than a month for DUSD.

The school board last month called for a mail-only special election May 7 for all DUSD residents to decide whether to renew the existing $96 parcel tax that is set to expire at the end of June. District officials have not clarified whether the parcel tax election could be consolidated with the new Area 4 trustee election.

Editor’s note: The Alameda County Office of Education cited California Government Code Section 6253.5 in denying the Weekly’s request for a copy of the petition. The code section states: “petitions circulated pursuant to Section 5091 of the Education Code ... and all memoranda prepared by the county elections officials in the examination of the petitions indicating which registered voters have signed particular petitions shall not be deemed to be public records and shall not be open to inspection except by the public officer or public employees who have the duty of receiving, examining or preserving the petitions or who are responsible for the preparation of that memoranda.”

We can't do it without you.
Support local journalism.

Comments

1 person likes this
Posted by faraz
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Feb 4, 2019 at 10:31 pm

Totally unfair :/ [Portion removed due to promoting a website]


10 people like this
Posted by Dublin Resident
a resident of Dublin
on Feb 6, 2019 at 10:14 am

While I've heard this petition was done in an effort to give Area 4 residents the opportunity to vote, all comments in favor of this appear to come from supporters of the other candidate that was seeking the appointment. One wonders if that same group would have forced a special election costing tens of thousands of dollars if their candidate would have been appointed. I'm guessing no. If that were the case, they would be perfectly happy with the process. This is not about having the voters select a candidate, it's about a specific group of people wanting a specific candidate put into place.


8 people like this
Posted by Area 4 Voter
a resident of Dublin
on Feb 6, 2019 at 11:52 am

It is great to hear that 5000 Dublin residents will be able to vote. Three School Board members from one side of town tried to steal this seat by appointing a provisional or temporary trustee, but in this case the law seems to favor the rights of voters and residents won back their right to vote. If residents had exercised this right for the many "insider" appointments over the past decade, we would probably already have a second 2000 seat high school now and DHS would be at 2000 students vs quickly approaching 4000. It is unfortunate, that that during the temporary appointees short tenure she voted to expand DHS 3700 which likely doomed any hope of a full second high school


7 people like this
Posted by Anu
a resident of Downtown
on Feb 6, 2019 at 4:47 pm

In the board meeting, the trustees mentioned that they wanted someone who would work with them. Does it mean they did not want someone who would not ask critical questions? If the appointment was based on the requirement that only a YES-(WO)MAN would be appointment, then the appointment itself is foiled.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields


Be the first to know

Get the latest headlines sent straight to your inbox every day.

Premarital and Couples: Living as Roommates?
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,383 views

Police chiefs worried about assembly bill
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 1,002 views

Barone’s restaurant, other task force rezoning plans, up for review at Tuesday’s Pleasanton City Council meeting
By Jeb Bing | 1 comment | 838 views

 

Pleasanton Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Pleasanton Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 20th. Stay tuned for the results in the June 28th issue of the Pleasanton Weekly.

VOTE HERE