News


Counties can't 'opt out' of sharing fingerprints of those arrested with federal immigration officials

Program 'makes innocent people afraid of law enforcement,' Santa Clara County supervisor says

Federal immigration officials have rejected calls by San Francisco and Santa Clara counties to opt out of a controversial program that shares the fingerprints of arrestees with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to representatives for both counties.

Alameda County is participating in the program.

David Venturella, director of ICE's Secure Communities program, informed representatives from both San Francisco and Santa Clara counties during meetings that the program would move forward, representatives who were present at the meetings said.

Both counties passed resolutions earlier this year asking to be removed from the program, which they said is being used to deport not only violent criminals in the country illegally, but also undocumented residents without criminal records who are accused of minor offenses.

"They told us we cannot opt out," said Santa Clara County Deputy County Counsel Anjali Bhargava. Secure Communities was implemented in all counties last May.

"They never intended to allow local governments to opt out," Bhargava said. "From our view that was really inconsistent with the written statements they had provided to us."

The statements said individual jurisdictions could meet with ICE to discuss concerns about the program's implementation, she said.

ICE issued a statement that confirmed the meetings, but it did not specifically address whether the jurisdictions were told they could not opt out.

"In those discussions, ICE representatives underscored that Secure Communities does not require state and local law enforcement agencies to enforce immigration law," the statement said. "Instead, the program relies on information-sharing between federal partners, and ICE independently enforces the immigration law, as appropriate, if a person in criminal custody is subject to removal proceedings."

Immigrant rights groups have assailed Secure Communities as terrorizing immigrant communities. They say that contrary to its stated purpose, it does not make communities safer; rather, they say, it makes witnesses to crimes more afraid to come forward to police.

"This program makes innocent people afraid of law enforcement," Santa Clara County Supervisor George Shirakawa said in a statement. "Our county does not want to be at the forefront of new immigration enforcement programs that make us lose our residents' trust."

According to Bhargava, of the 523 people arrested or booked into ICE custody since the program began in Santa Clara County, 133 had no prior criminal record. She said that pattern could be found throughout the state and nationwide.

San Francisco Sheriff Michael Hennessey has said the program conflicts with his city's sanctuary ordinance. Secure Communities was implemented there in June. Sheriff's Department spokeswoman Eileen Hirst said that Venturella apologized at their meeting for earlier ICE "misstatements" that led them to believe they could opt out.

"But the answer is no, a single county cannot opt out of sending their fingerprints through the ICE database once the state has signed a memorandum of agreement with Secure Communities," Hirst paraphrased Venturella as saying.

California's agreement was signed by the state Department of Justice in April 2009.

Bay City News contributed to this story.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by SteveP
a resident of Parkside
on Nov 22, 2010 at 8:40 am

SteveP is a registered user.

I almost fell out of my chair when I read this comment: "This program makes innocent people afraid of law enforcement," Santa Clara County Supervisor George Shirakawa said in a statement. "Our county does not want to be at the forefront of new immigration enforcement programs that make us lose our residents' trust."

This guy cannot possibly believe his own drivel. These illegals have just been arrested for committing crimes in our country and he's worried these 'innocent' people will be afraid? They should be afraid--they've just broken not one, but two laws, one being invading our country.
He's also worried about losing 'our resident's trust'. Residents? really? How about illegal occupiers?
He's really worried about losing their votes, for not protecting their 'right' to continue to break our laws unabated. Unbelievable.


Like this comment
Posted by 73% did have Criminal Records!
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 2, 2010 at 4:21 pm

If: "of the 523 people arrested or booked into ICE custody since the program began in Santa Clara County, 133 had no prior criminal record.", then 390 had been caught before. Why did they state it backwards? Most criminals are not caught the first time, and commit multiple crimes.
I'm in favor of identifying people, especially when they are caught in a crime.
If they are innocent that will come out in the courts.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Pleasanton's home-grown "unicorn"
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 1,222 views

Ten Tips for Teens and Young Adults to Survive a Dysfunctional Family
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 762 views

Can You Afford Your ‘Dream School’?
By Elizabeth LaScala | 2 comments | 364 views

The Five
By Jeb Bing | 0 comments | 204 views