Election reflections | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | PleasantonWeekly.com |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

Election reflections

Uploaded: Nov 15, 2016
In this bluest of blue states thanks to the wealthy coastal counties, running simply as a Democrat did not work for former Pleasanton Councilwoman Cheryl Cook-Kallio. Republican incumbent Catharine Baker easily topped Cook-Kallio, garnering 56 percent of the unofficial totals.
That was much more comfortable than the 51.5-48.5 win over former Dublin Mayor Tim Sbranti in the low turnout year of 2014.
That Baker built a larger lead in a presidential year with a much greater turnout is a tribute to the moderate record she has built as well as her consistent outreach to residents over the last two years. She has “showed up” a lot and that counts.
As I observed previously, Cheryl’s campaign managers seemed to have decided that the key strategy was making sure voters knew she was a Democrat.
Continuing the trend of never seeing a tax measure that they did not support, Alameda County voters overwhelmingly approved a more than $500 million bond measure for affordable and low-income housing. Since the elimination of redevelopment districts that requires a 25 percent investment into low-costs and affordable housing, it has gotten much more competitive to qualify for the tax-credit financing to build these projects.
The large bond measure will put a big chunk of money toward these projects, but it far from the solution. The Bay Area is in a housing crisis because the supply of housing has not kept up with the welcome and explosive job growth. The job growth has been in the technology sector, but that also has spurred plenty of growth in construction jobs.
Contractors have been struggling to find enough qualified workers in the trades. Put it all together and it results in longer, tougher commutes and a higher cost of living.
Thanks to San Francisco and Alameda County voters, BART’s ill-advised $3.5 billion bond issue received the two-thirds margin necessary for passage. San Francisco voters approved it by an 80 percent margin, while Alameda County voters backed it 71-29 percent. Contra Costa, the smallest of the three counties, rejected it with 62 percent, but the overwhelming margins in the other two counties put it over the top.
Sad. There’s no plan attached to this gob of money and it can be shifted to non-capital expenses instead of being used to rebuild the system. BART already pays its non-skilled (high school diploma is all that is required for train operators or station agents) extraordinarily well and its directors have routinely caved to union demands.
Management and the union cut a contract extension deal before the bond measure was placed on the ballot so there will be two years of labor peace, but what’s needed is backbone on the Board of Directors and the management team.
BART is the critical mass transit backbone for the Bay Area and deserves quality leadership. It’s also sad that the other two counties being served by BART (San Mateo and Santa Clara) were non-participants (they also do not have board members), but that would by spread the burden.


Comments

 +   4 people like this
Posted by DKHSK, a resident of Bridle Creek,
on Nov 15, 2016 at 4:23 pm

DKHSK is a registered user.

I still cannot get over the choice we had for Senator - Kamala Harris OR Loretta Sanchez. I just left it blank.

Both are dreadful.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Nov 15, 2016 at 6:14 pm

Michael Austin is a registered user.

In some counties a blank selection voids the entire ballot.
The rules vary, county to county, state to state.


 +   1 person likes this
Posted by res1, a resident of Vineyard Hills,
on Nov 18, 2016 at 11:54 am

res1 is a registered user.

Michael, don't think you are right. Not voting for a particular item, or double-voting a particular item, voids that one race/measure but the rest of the ballot is good. Please let me know of a county or state that requires that every item be voted on or the whole ballot is rejected.


 +   1 person likes this
Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Nov 20, 2016 at 10:02 am

Many Americans are dissatisfied with the 2016 election results. Now we all have to pick up the pieces and moveon.com.

That's what makes the USA work. Our country is GREAT!

You can vote in the USA and come out of the election booth ALIVE!

VIVA AMERICA! VIVA!


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

The valley needs strong leadership on BART board
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 4,017 views

3 Great Ways to Showcase Your Strengths on College Applications!
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 359 views

10th year tribute to Laurel Williams set for Friday
By Jeb Bing | 1 comment | 201 views