More "feel-good" legislation from Sacramento | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

More "feel-good" legislation from Sacramento

Uploaded: Oct 15, 2013
With last Sunday the deadline for Gov. Brown to sign or veto the 805 bills the Legislature sent to his desk, he continued to walk a bit more moderate line in some areas than might have been expected given his history.

For instance, he vetoed seven of the 18 gun bills that reached his desk?the flood sparked by the horrific Newtown elementary school shooting. That means California, which already has extremely tough gun control laws, will add 11 more.

How that will stop the ongoing violence in Oakland and Richmond?most perpetrated by black young men against other black young men?is the key question the Legislature and the governor have failed to answer. Legislators can point to the bills and their voting record and argue they have done something?the broader question is rarely asked: Will it do any good or has it ever done any good?

History says they continue to joust at windmills as opposed to drilling down in the causes and working to deal with those issues.

For instance, what steps have the well-intentioned legislators taken to address the nearly complete breakdown of the black family? Before Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" 70 percent of black children grew up with a mom and dad in their home. Today, it's just 30 percent.

SWITCHING GEARS?It will be most interesting, now that the San Ramon City Council has approved yet another plan for a new city hall in partnership with Sunset Development Co. (the developers and operators of Bishop Ranch), whether it will actually be built.

The county-developed community with a 585-acre business park in its heart has struggled since its incorporation in 1983 to develop a true downtown gathering place. That has been the subject of numerous studies and ensuing plans, but nothing has actually happened.

The latest iteration leaves open the possibility of a gathering place and will give the city a civic center. The economic downturn sidelined the prior ambitious plan.

Three Tri-Valley cities (Dublin, Danville and San Ramon) all incorporated in the early 1980s. San Ramon leaders focused their resources on parks and buildings (the community center) that were designed to bring the community together because there was no downtown San Ramon just as there was no downtown Dublin.

Danville's quaint downtown had been in place for decades and was the natural gathering place. Dublin built its unique round civic center as one of the city's first projects, while San Ramon bought a modest single-story business center that houses much of its city operations to this day. That site will be ripe for redevelopment if the current plans, which the City Council has approved, play out.

The tradeoff is that the city will renovate the existing library for $1 million. It's a reversal of a public policy that I have always admired in San Ramon?focus on buildings that serve the constituents and let public employees work in modest but efficient spaces instead of traditional showcase city halls.

What is it worth to you?


Posted by Stevo, a resident of San Ramon,
on Oct 15, 2013 at 9:34 am

Well said; Moonbeam isn't any wiser at 80 than he was the last time contrary to his campaign. I know I feel a lot safer knowing those "high capacity" (over 10 rounds) have been banned. I'm sure the gangbangers are turning them in right now. The real problem is societal/cultural.

Posted by Paul Runyon, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood,
on Oct 15, 2013 at 12:33 pm

Yet another stellar piece, Tim. Might I recommend that if you want to say anything - beyond a 100 words per topic, that is - you might consider doing a little research, you know, reading and such. Then, after so doing, you might be able to back up some of your bloated claims with some evidence, or some rationale that could be fit into an actual argument.

For example, you ask, rhetorically: "what steps have the well-intentioned legislators taken to address the nearly complete breakdown of the black family? Before Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" 70 percent of black children grew up with a mom and dad in their home. Today, it's just 30 percent."

Last time I looked, Tim, African-American families were ravaged in the 1960s by industrial flight from cities into the suburbs. I'm not sure how Lyndon Johnson's Great Society contributed to that -- unless, as you suggest, there was something wrong with giving African Americans voting rights. It's a terrible world outside of Pleasanton, isn't it?

Keep up the good work, Tim. You're a model for us all.

Posted by Chemist, a resident of Downtown,
on Oct 16, 2013 at 9:24 am

Dear Paul,
Starting with LBJ's "Great Society", Aid to Mothers with Dependent Children was available to families as long as there was no husband/father to be found. Think this might have something to do with the number of children who grew up without having a father around? Your "industrial flight from cities into the suburbs" is just more of the "feel good" nonsense Tim is discussing. Blame the problem on things that cannot be changed, and then those folks who favor an entitlement system don't have to face the truth that entitlement leads to more entitlement and eventually will lead to nowhere.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 10 comments | 2,298 views

Reflecting on lives this Thanksgiving Day
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,110 views

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 697 views


Support local families in need

Your contribution to the Pleasanton Weekly Holiday Fund will go directly to nonprofits supporting local families and children in need. Last year, Pleasanton Weekly readers contributed over $83,000 to support eight safety-net nonprofits right here in the Tri-Valley.