Support local journalism!
Help preserve local news coverage in print and online.
Become a member now!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Pleasanton, California Forecast

TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS & MOVIES   COMMENTS ON STORIES
  CRIMES & INCIDENTS   RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS
  STATE, NATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL   EDITOR'S BLOG   LOL (LESSONS ON LAUGHTER)   PUBLISHER'S BLOG
  REPORTER'S BLOG TIM HUNT

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
Regional theater backers head to court
Tim Hunt, posted by Tim Hunt, a resident of the Castlewood neighborhood, on Mar 5, 2013 at 8:06 am
Tim Hunt is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com

It was no surprise when the Livermore Valley Performing Arts Center filed legal action against the state of California.

When Gov. Jerry Brown targeted redevelopment agencies as one source of money to close the yawning gap in his first budget, the handwriting was on the wall for the remarkably ambitious plans of the Livermore group. It operates the Bankhead Theater, a 507-seat community facility in downtown Livermore that has been well utilized since it opened in 2007.

More problematic for the organization are the plans for a 2,000-seat regional theater designed to compete with the major houses in San Francisco and San Jose. Those plans hinged on redevelopment funds coming from the increased property values of the theater and surrounding commercial and residential development. As it became clear that the Legislature was going to follow the governor’s lead and eliminate the agencies, the arts group and the city entered in what they argue is a binding agreement for $122 million in redevelopment agency funds.

The law abolishing the redevelopment agencies set up successor agencies made up of local officials. These are charged with determining whether obligations of the agencies were binding and pre-dated the change of the law and thus needed to be paid. The Livermore agency made that finding, but the state review—done by former Alameda County executive Steve Szalay—disallowed the charge, leaving the performing arts group with no choice but to try its hand in court.

The legal costs, if the Livermore group is successful, are trivial when compared with the construction costs of the theater to say nothing of the operating costs is the projections turn out to be a bit rosy.

It will be interesting to see how long the city leaders hang in with a giant vacant lot in downtown Livermore targeted for the theater. That site originally was designed for a mixed use retail and residential development that won city approval but never moved forward when the developer could not line up financing. With the residential market heating rapidly, there may well be a demand for a downtown project.

The arts board has a number of influential citizens who will want to see this one through, regardless of the amount of time the land stands vacant downtown.


Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments
There are no comments yet for this post.
Be the first!

Comments on this topic have been limited to registered users who are logged in.

If you are a registered user, login here.
If not, registration is very simple and may be done here.
 

PleasantonWeekly.com ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.