Support local journalism!
Help preserve local news coverage in print and online.
Become a member now!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Pleasanton, California Forecast

TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS & MOVIES COMMENTS ON STORIES
  CRIMES & INCIDENTS   RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS
  STATE, NATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL   EDITOR'S BLOG   LOL (LESSONS ON LAUGHTER)   PUBLISHER'S BLOG
  REPORTER'S BLOG   TIM HUNT

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MESSAGE BOARD VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
State rules PG&E can charge ratepayers for part of $2.2 billion needed for pipeline upgrades
Comments on Stories, posted by Editor, Pleasanton Weekly Online, on Dec 21, 2012 at 8:52 am

The California Public Utilities Commission Thursday approved a plan that will allow PG&E to charge ratepayers for more than half of a $2.2

billion project to upgrade its natural gas pipelines.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, December 21, 2012, 7:46 AM

Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments

Posted by Who?, a resident of the Foothill Farms neighborhood, on Dec 21, 2012 at 8:52 am

Maybe the PG&E execs can kick in their million dollar bonuses to help pay for the work they didn't get done?


Posted by Daniel Bradford, a member of the Foothill High School community, on Dec 21, 2012 at 1:27 pm

So: PG&E's gross negligence kills 8 people in San Bruno and traumatizes hundreds of residents...and PG&E was supposed to do this maintenance all along, and pass the cost of it along to consumers...and now PG&E wants its customers to pay HALF?

PG&E shareholders should have to bear 100% of the burden of this cost, not the ratepayers. Customers have been paying for pipeline maintenance all along, but it appears PG&E preferred to use its maintenance funds for paying executive salaries and shareholder dividends.

Amazing how companies always privatize profits but socialize the losses. We do have socialism in America, but only when the banks, auto industry, and utilities get themselves into trouble.

And where are the criminal indictments against PG&E executives for killing 8 people and destroying 38 homes? And while we're at it, let's send the bill for those 200 firefighters who responded to the San Bruno disaster to PG&E.

PG&E is a criminal enterprise, plain and simple, and forcing customers to pay half the cost of the pipelines when PG&E is 100% at fault is the same as someone breaking your kneecaps and then only paying half your medical bills...and not going to jail for it, either.

If "corporations are people", as Mitt Romney claimed, then let's throw PG&E in jail. If we're going to have socialism, anyway, then the state should just take over PG&E and run it on behalf of the consumers. The DWP in Los Angeles is a municipal owned utility and they have lower rates and better service than PG&E customers--and DWP doesn't kill its customers and then expect them to pay for the cleanup.


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: *
Comment: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box. *
Verification Code:   
 

PleasantonWeekly.com ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.