Post a New Topic
Original post made
on Aug 22, 2008
If Councilmember Matt Sullivan is upset that the Council job doesn't pay his rent, perhaps he should reconsider his run for his seat! What a lame excuse. The request to extend the deadline is a simple political tactic, just as the denial of such request.
Once again you speak from the comfort of your living room.
You have no perspective of what it is like to be keeping a paid job, raising a family and actively participating in the community. Even the council representatives that I don't support I respect for their commitment of time to our community.
What is the political advantage to extend the deadline? I believe it is a challenging process to refine the language. I do agree the denial to extend is political as there could be no harm to do so.
It's the Adams vs the Jeffersons. Where's Mayor Hosterman? Vacation you say? Last report was, she was noodling(fishing with your hands) in the back lakes, behind Shadow Cliffs with Tim Hunt, securing positive press coverage for these next 2 1/2 months.It's reported that she may not attend anymore council meetings until Barack Obama calls her personally to engage. Mayor Hosterman, in a position, damn if you do and damn if you don't. As the Mayor might say, NO MATTER!
There are many important issues out there outside this agenda item, waiting until Monday would of changed "NOTHING". What does that mean? Jerry Thorne/Cheryl Cook-Kallio should of had patience until Monday.
And once again you base your position on a false assumption. No one in the US ever has to earn the right to form and speak their opinions. I will never expect you to actively participate in national politics before giving credibility to your opinions on the presidential election.
But hey, it wasn't me who was complaining they've got a job THEY VOLUNTEERED FOR that doesn't pay the rent.
Hey Linda, some links for you!
"It held that the citizen's right to criticize government officials is of such tremendous importance in a democratic society that it can only be accommodated through the tolerance of speech which may eventually be determined to contain falsehoods."
"New York Times v. Sullivan, established the principle that freedom of expression is most highly protected when one is criticizing the government and government officials, and, conversely, that public officials enjoy very little protection from criticism, even when that criticism is based on error. "
"Freedom of speech is crucial in any participatory democracy, because open discussions of candidates are essential for voters to make informed decisions during elections. It is through speech that people can influence their government's choice of policies. Also, public officials are held accountable through criticisms that can pave the way for their replacement."
I did not question your right to criticize, I questioned your credibility.
Having been involved in my community at a similar level as Mr. Sullivan I don't think it is a lame excuse or political tactic, and I am pointing out your limited perspective in saying so.
Just back in June Cook-Kallio requested that item be heard when it was scheduled because of a work conflict the following meeting and Sullivan absolutely refused.
He continued the item anyway. Then complained when the council majority scheduled a special meeting during his vacation. Biased?????
The delay by Sullivan was an attempt to silence the input of a councilmember.
People plan based on the schedule.
Exactly what I was saying! Through questioning my credibility, which can have the effect of diminishing my message in the minds of other readers, you're basically asking me to earn the right to criticize Mr. Sullivan. Your words are a basic ad hominem attack. Your position is based upon this false assumption.
"The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the argument being made)." Web Link
Ad hominem does not apply. An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
The fact that you do not have the experience to support your criticism that Mr. Sullivan's claim is 'a lame excuse' is relevant. No false assumption... my intent is to diminish your message as I believe it is the false assumption.
Sullivan and McGovern wanted to extend the deadline, which is allowed by Alameda Co registrar, by THREEE days (and really ONE business day since it's a weekend). With a business trip as a conflict for Sullivan, were is the harm in the extension? The other council members have done stuff like that before. Oh wait a minute, they don't like the citizen's initiative. I guess that explains it. Thorne and Kallio are about as biased as they come. Heaven help us if we lose McGovern or Sullivan.
IT'S ONE BUSINESS DAY!!!! Continuing an item for another council meeting is 2 weeks, this is one business day!! I don't know the reason Sullivan continued the item you're talking about, but could there have been a reason behind it? Depending on what kind of item, could it have been due to someone from the public not being able to do it at that time? I don't know details and you didn't give any, so no way to judge. But again, it's one business day. And the reason Kallio gave was that having more time (a weekend) would prevent her from doing other work. HUH???????? Makes no sense, that is the reason it appears to be biased.
I just copied two of my posts (above) from another blog with the same name (it's in "around town").
The comment that Sullivan should reconsider his run because of his job is so heartless to say. You're saying that anyone with a job shouldn't run? It sure is easier if you are retired or a homemaker, but most people aren't. If you were paying attention you would have heard that Sullivan has a business trip at the end of the week, he was not saying that his council job should pay his rent. Sometimes business trips are unavoidable. Again, what is the harm in extending a deadline by ONE BUSINESS DAY!!! How cruel.
So his job is more important than hers? and schedules don't matter. It is just one day. So it shouldn't have been a problem to get it done. It was the council that set the schedule with Sullivan voting yes.
why do you think that I meant his job is more important than hers? He had a business trip and just asked for the weekend. You are just trying to be antagonistic because I never said anything about Kallio's job. Again, her excuse for not voting for the extension was that if she had more time, she wouldn't get things done. Look at the replay if you don't remember. Her response isn't logical and therefore, it was a biased response.
Linda, let's go back to your statement:
"Once again you speak from the comfort of your living room.
You have no perspective of what it is like to be keeping a paid job, raising a family and actively participating in the community. "
By this statement, you intentfully and purposely diminsh her statements of opinion. What information about Stacey do you have that substantiates your defamation of her and her character?
I'm all ears.......
What you haven't done is provide a convincing argument as to why my experience level is relevant. I suspect the reason for that is because you can't. It would involve you having to explain: 1) why we don't hear other Councilmembers utilize that kind of excuse for things they don't agree with (perhaps because it is lame?), 2) why specifically volunteering in a community is a prerequisite despite the fact that time management is a common experience to the vast majority of humans on this planet, and 3) why you don't attack any other writer on this forum with my equal lack of experience that also criticize government officials (perhaps because it is irrelevant?). I mean, where are you on some of the other threads here championing your position against posters (not I) who criticize the actions of Hosterman? And so, as such, "ad hominem" applies.
If Sullivan's "dog ate my homework" excuse is acceptable to you, that is certainly your prerogative.
Regarding my comments, relating to Mayor Hosterman and Tim Hunt. A friend called me to explain that my sense of humor might be taken as offensive. I asked why? He said, people who don't know you or understand the background, of relationships, will only see the bad. He said, the point I made was good but the analogy to get there was ridiculous. It was suppose to be ridiculous. If it was hurtful, in any way, I apologize deeply. I am glad to have, a good friend. Yes, words can be hurtful without clarifacation. Let me share with you where this mind was when I wrote comment.
a)thought that Mayor Hosterman should have been at meeting to hear her take on this matter(forgive me)... she was on vacation, I should respect that
b)MSN web page had a picture of a huge catfish...the thought of noodling came to mind,the art of catfishing with your hands
c)Tim Hunt came to mind, a man who speaks his mind with an occassional different view than the Mayor
e)Shadow Cliff pun, I walk there often
Point is, nothing came to mind other than just being ridiculous. There is useful information that comes from these blogs and realize that if people don't understand something, ask to clarify. Respectfully
am I to understand that the race is getting (Comment partially removed by Pleasanton Weekly Online staff)?
Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online.
Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.
Select your neighborhood or school community: *
- Amador Estates
- Amberwood/Wood Meadows
- Another Pleasanton neighborhood
- Apperson Ridge
- Beratlis Place
- Bonde Ranch
- Bordeaux Estates
- Bridle Creek
- California Reflections
- California Somerset
- Canyon Creek
- Canyon Meadows
- Canyon Oaks
- Carlton Oaks
- Carriage Gardens
- Castlewood Heights
- Charter Oaks
- Civic Square
- Country Fair
- Danbury Park
- Deer Oaks/Twelve Oaks
- Del Prado
- Foothill Farms
- Foothill Knolls
- Foothill Place
- Foxborough Estates
- Golden Eagle
- Grey Eagle Estates
- Hacienda Gardens
- Happy Valley
- Heritage Oaks
- Heritage Valley
- Highland Oaks
- Jensen Tract
- Kolb Ranch Estates
- Kottinger Ranch
- Laguna Oaks
- Laguna Vista
- Las Positas
- Las Positas Garden Homes
- Lemoine Ranch
- Lund Ranch II
- Mariposa Ranch
- Mission Park
- Mohr Park
- Nolan Farms
- Oak Hill
- Oak Tree Acres
- Old Towne
- Pheasant Ridge
- Pleasanton Heights
- Pleasanton Meadows
- Pleasanton Valley
- Pleasanton Village
- Remen Tract
- Ridgeview Commons
- Ruby Hill
- Southeast Pleasanton
- Spotorno Ranch
- Stoneridge Orchards
- Stoneridge Park
- Sycamore Heights
- Sycamore Place
- The Knolls
- Val Vista
- Valley Trails
- Vineyard Avenue
- Vineyard Hills
- Vintage Hills Elementary School
- Walnut Hills
- West of Foothill
- Willow West
- Alisal Elementary School
- Amador Valley High School
- Donlon Elementary School
- Fairlands Elementary School
- Foothill High School
- Hart Middle School
- Harvest Park Middle School
- Horizon High School
- Lydiksen Elementary School
- Mohr Elementary School
- Pleasanton Middle School
- Valley View Elementary School
- Village High School
- Vintage Hills Elementary School
- Walnut Grove Elementary School
- another community
- San Ramon
Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.
Another bad idea from the air board
By Tim Hunt | 20 comments | 2,389 views
Bidding My Training Dept. Goodbye
By Roz Rogoff | 4 comments | 568 views
Home & Real Estate
Send News Tips
Circulation & Delivery
San Ramon Express
© 2015 Pleasanton Weekly
All rights reserved.