Town Square

Post a New Topic

Swalwell's inappropriate remark in Congress

Original post made by Tim Hunt, Castlewood, on Sep 26, 2013

Congressman Eric Swalwell took a bad page out of his predecessor's book when he chastised Republicans during the debate last week on defunding Obamacare as part of a continuing resolution to fund the federal government when the new fiscal year starts Oct. 1.

This story contains 472 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (8)

Like this comment
Posted by Daveg
a resident of Birdland
on Sep 26, 2013 at 8:23 am

Daveg is a registered user.

Although I'm not a fan of Obamacare,I think some of your statements are incorrect. For example:
Claim: Congress is exempt from the law.

FactCheck.org says: False.

Several versions of this claim have been circulating since before the Affordable Care Act was passed. But no matter how many different ways the critics spin it, Congress isn't exempt from the law. In fact, members and their staffs face additional requirements that other Americans don't. Beginning in 2014, they can no longer get insurance through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, as they and other federal employees have done. Instead, they are required to get insurance through the insurance exchanges.


Like this comment
Posted by liberalism is a disease
a resident of Birdland
on Sep 26, 2013 at 2:09 pm

liberalism is a disease is a registered user.

From the National Review on 9/16 ( Web Link):
"Senator David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, has demanded a floor vote on his bill to end an exemption that members of Congress and their staffs are slated to get that will make them the only participants in the new Obamacare exchanges to receive generous subsidies from their employer to pay for their health insurance."
"Under behind-the-scenes pressure from members of Congress in both parties, President Obama used the quiet of the August recess to personally order the Office of Personnel Management, which supervises federal employment issues, to interpret the law so as to retain the generous congressional benefits."


Like this comment
Posted by Daveg
a resident of Birdland
on Sep 26, 2013 at 6:35 pm

Daveg is a registered user.

Sure hope somebody can straighten this out. This the latest from Fact Check:
REPEATED CLAIMS

We also heard some claims that we have debunked before, including these:
•Cruz repeated the false claim that members of Congress are exempt from the health care law. As we have written numerous times, the law requires congressional members and their staffs to get insurance through the newly created exchanges, so they are not exempt. In fact, the law prevents them from getting insurance through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, like other federal employees. However, the federal government, will continue to make contributions toward the premiums of lawmakers and their staffs — just as most large employers do for their employees.


Like this comment
Posted by Jack
a resident of Downtown
on Sep 26, 2013 at 9:42 pm

Jack is a registered user.

I remember learning the definition of "wet dream" from my sex education class taught to me in Pleasanton during the 70's. I just asked my sixth grader if he was taught the term "wet dream" in his "human growth and development" course last year, he smirked and said, "Yes. Why?"
"Wet dream" is not an R rated term. I'll speak for myself, and I think it's funny, and I think it's great that our young, new congressman from the Tri-Valley is getting some national attention. And by the way, most of Washington needs to wake up from their "radical, ideological wet dreams and come back to reality."
Well said Eric...


Like this comment
Posted by BobB
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Sep 26, 2013 at 11:22 pm

BobB is a registered user.

Tim Hunt said:

"How much have you heard lately about how damaging the sequester has been?"

If you're a cancer patient, you may be feeling the damage.

Web Link

Web Link

Please tell me that you don't agree with "Julia Pardini" from Alamo that "the medical industry does not want to cure breast cancer ... ". You don't believe that, right?

Web Link


Like this comment
Posted by liberalism is a disease
a resident of Birdland
on Sep 27, 2013 at 8:44 am

liberalism is a disease is a registered user.

Anything goes, eh, Jack? So much for decorum, ethics and professionalism. But ,then Swallow and folks of his ilk are products of the same public school environment that your son is subjected to. I suppose you think his comments are appropriate since they tend to related to the lowest common denominator and tend to try to bring us all down to that level...or is that assumption 'premature e......."?
Here's to hoping for higher standards from our public officials and that the voting public doesn't get dragged down to the gutter they currently prefer to occupy.


Like this comment
Posted by Jack
a resident of Downtown
on Sep 27, 2013 at 2:09 pm

Jack is a registered user.

You want to get upset over something? Get upset over this whole Syria debacle! Or the national debt, or all these wars we keep jumping into, or the fact that we still can't get people good, secure jobs. Or get upset that some poor guy lies in a coma because he got beat up in front of his house in Pleasanton...
But your Congressman's use of the phrase "wet dream?"
Wet Dream, wet dream, wet dream, wet dream!!!
It's a phrase taught to fifth graders!
Swalwell made his point!
And as for his "decorum, ethics, and professionalism," I will judge him more on the stance he took on Syria, and the stance he took on TSA wanting to allow knives on airplanes a helluva lot more than his use of "Wet Dream!"


Like this comment
Posted by Janna
a resident of Dublin
on Sep 29, 2013 at 9:09 am

Janna is a registered user.

Really Disease?

Darth Cheney told Leahy to go f__k himself on the floor of the senate. Isn't he your hero?

Spare us your outrage.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Changing my Registration for Bernie
By Roz Rogoff | 80 comments | 1,139 views

Conjecture Madness
By Tom Cushing | 4 comments | 486 views

Celebrating a long overdue groundbreaking
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 428 views

So You Are Planning on a Career in Law? Read on!
By Elizabeth LaScala | 2 comments | 344 views