In the interest of accuracy and fairness it should be noted that the plea agreement from which your newspaper took virtually all of its Jan. 4 article ("Pleasanton attorney admits forgery, lying to IRS") contemplates punishment of six months home detention, a fine of approximately $30,000 and that I retire from the practice of law. This is a far cry from the maximum punishment which you reference on two occasions in your article.
It is also relevant that there was no tax loss to the government nor did I profit by so much as a nickel. Further, nowhere in the plea agreement is the word "forged" or "forgery" used. The sentence will be imposed on April 19 after the probation process is completed.
William A. Hirst
Our many amazing administrators
As a Pleasanton resident for 45 years with six children who graduated from Pleasanton schools and grandchildren currently attending, I have been happy with the district, especially the teachers who are innovative and dedicated while enduring the pressures of parents and a central office that expects high performance. However, lately I am less than enamored of the school board and superintendent's cabinet. While teachers, classified and custodial staff haven't had a raise in five years, they granted Luz Cazares, Assistant Superintendent, Business Services, an enormous raise, a retirement boost, and virtually a lifetime dental, health and vision package.
Jeff Bowser, Chris Grant, Joan Laursen and the cabinet must live on a different planet than the rest of us. The rumor was that San Ramon Unified, a district of equal excellence, might snatch Luz up if we weren't careful. Seriously? If Luz resigned, Pleasanton would have hundreds of applicants. There is no shortage of amazing administrators seeking work in districts like ours. Thankfully two members of the school board have sense and integrity -- thank you, Jamie Hintzke and Valerie Arkin, for holding your ground. When are the others up for re-election?
P.S. PUSD should have defended Amador Valley Principal Jim Hansen's wise decision to not allow students to have their gratuitously idiotic pictures in the yearbook. Why fear the ACLU? They were wrong. Being in the yearbook is a privilege for students who actually attend Amador, not a venue for former students to be cute and/or look like imbeciles. They can post that stuff on Twitter or Facebook.
This story contains 400 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.