News


Calendar 'option' on Pleasanton school board's agenda tonight

Board's last meeting until August

The Pleasanton school board has a packed agenda for tonight's meeting, which includes: a discussion and vote for an "alternative academic calendar option", the approval of the Local Control and Accountability Plan, and the approval of the 2014-15 budget.

It will be the board's last meeting of the current school year with the first meeting of the 2014-15 school year scheduled for August.

According to the agenda packet, district staff recommends the board to approve the modified lite calendar for the 2015-16 school.

After months of analyzing data collected and hearing community input, the board will decide if this is the best calendar option that will meet the academic and social-emotional needs of the students.

The possible calendar modification discussion began in October and was presented to the board on May 27 and June 3. In addition, the calendar committee held meetings about the calendar options, sent out staff and parent surveys, created a designated email for community input and posted the information on the district website.

In other business, the board will review and vote to approve the Local Control and Accountability Plan. After the June 3 public hearing on LCAP, changes and additions have been made to the plan.

Also during open session, the board will be asked to approve the 2014-15 budget. According to the agenda, no changes were made to the proposed budget presented to the board on June 3, except the following:

* The PUSD budgeted positions totaling $74,000, which provides an additional hour of library assistants at each elementary school as approved by the board in February 2014 and continues funding for the clerical staff supporting the implementation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS). In addition, the PUSD budgeted $61,000 for instructional materials to increase resources for site libraries to provide greater access to materials and content as noted on the LCAP.

* Revenues and expenditures were increased by $173,000 to reflect positions that are contracted to other institutions (i.e., 1.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) coordinator position for the Tri-Valley Regional Occupational Program (ROP) and 0.20 FTE coordinator position for the New Teacher Center (NTC)).

* The PUSD adjusted revenue for the California Clean Energy Jobs Act, also known as Proposition 39, by $0.2 million at Estimated Actuals to reflect the updated estimated entitlement provided by the State. This change increased the legally restricted fund balance by the same amount.

In closed session scheduled to begin at 5 p.m., the board will discuss two public employee discipline cases and the approval of "algebra waiver for student #45902."

Any action taken in closed session will be reported at the regular school board meeting.

The regular school board meeting begins at 7 p.m. in the district's boardroom at 4665 Bernal Avenue.

Comments

Posted by Frustrated, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 16, 2014 at 8:53 pm

According to the parent survey results found on the board agenda for tomorrow night, 30% of the parents want to keep the traditional calendar, and only 18% want the modified lite. Yet……

"district staff recommends the board to approve the modified lite calendar for the 2015-16 school"

It has been obvious from the first meeting I attended that this is what the district was planning to do. I am so frustrated by this process and the district office staff not really using the survey results to guide their decision making.


Posted by Frustrated, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 16, 2014 at 8:56 pm

I just went back to look at the results one last time, and realized that it is actually 35% of the parents who want traditional. Now I am even more frustrated!


Posted by Figures don't lie, a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 16, 2014 at 9:06 pm

Looking at the results of the two surveys - how can the staff recommend the modified lite. It is only favored by the staff not the parents.

The survey shows an overwhelming vote to keep traditional.

In a community, the minority should not be the majority decision.


Posted by Jam, a resident of Mohr Park
on Jun 16, 2014 at 9:19 pm

Where can one find the parent survey results?


Posted by Mark, a resident of Bordeaux Estates
on Jun 16, 2014 at 9:41 pm

As a teacher I always poll the parents of my students. If a third of the parents are against me assigning Huckleberry Finn, well that's all I need. I'll assign Elmo and His Friends instead. Because teachers are meant to do what parents want. The parents, after all, know what's best for their kids. All teachers and administrators shouldn't make any decisions without putting it to a vote in the community. Duh!


Posted by Figures don't lie, a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 16, 2014 at 9:55 pm

To JAM

Hope you can follow how I found the survey.

Click on the third paragraph on the words "agenda packet"

You will then see Pleasanton Unified School District - at the upper top click on meetings (very small)

You should see June 17 Regular Board Meeting - go all the way down to 13.1 of the agenda and click on

A new screen will come up-at the bottom- Click on supporting documents-download now

Go to page 4 0f 7 Parental Calendar Survey - very interesting !!!!!!

Hope more of the residence of Pleasanton will look at this.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 16, 2014 at 10:04 pm

Calendar change, Survey results:

Web Link


Posted by REQUEST, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 16, 2014 at 10:09 pm

PLEASE LOOK AT THE PARENTS SURVEY - it is not what the district staff recommends that the board approve.
PARENTS STILL WANT THE TRADITIONAL

I wish the article would have put in the results of the two surveys in the initial part of this page instead of having to search for it.

I hope the board takes a serious look at this.


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 16, 2014 at 10:11 pm

Calendar change, survey results:

35% want traditional
20% want early start/early finish
18% want modified lite
17% want modified hybrid
10% want modified

Here is the link to the results:

Web Link

(can be found on the PUSD website, agenda for june 17, item 13, 1.13.1, go to the bottom of the page, under 'supporting documents' , click on 13.1 calendar presentation, 'download now'


Posted by Figures don't lie, a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 16, 2014 at 10:13 pm

Thank you RESIDENT for making it easier than I did to find the surveys !!!!


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 16, 2014 at 10:21 pm

And here are the calendar options:

Web Link

Even though parents want the traditional calendar, the district is recommending the modified lite, which comes with a break in october, something we do not need


Posted by Michelle, a resident of Castlewood
on Jun 16, 2014 at 10:21 pm

To download the survey results, where 35% of the parents want the traditional calendar:
Web Link
click on 13.1
Then you have to download it.
check out page 4 of 7….and even after that… MR McCoy still recommends changing the calendar!!! (20% want modified lite- that is the next highest percentage, after the 35% that want traditional)


Posted by Michelle, a resident of Castlewood
on Jun 16, 2014 at 10:23 pm

Oops...disregard my last post...thank you Resident.


Posted by Bill, a resident of Pleasanton Heights
on Jun 16, 2014 at 11:50 pm

Actually, the parents overwhelmingly want a shortened calendar with more time off during the school year.

That's what I get from the results.


Posted by PtownL, a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Jun 17, 2014 at 4:42 am

Have to agree with Bill, as the survey clearly shows the majority (65%) of parents favor a non-traditional calendar. It's now up to the board to decide which non-traditional calendar option best meets the needs of the students. Not necessarily what I was hoping for but, as someone said above, figures don't lie.


Posted by Jill, a resident of Carlton Oaks
on Jun 17, 2014 at 6:42 am

Agree with Bill and PtownL that I see the results as the majority wanting a modified calendar. They're (we're) split on which one, but I don't see the differences between them as being that substantial. The biggest change is what they all have in common, which is really the year start and end dates.


Posted by Figures don't lie, a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 17, 2014 at 7:35 am

When you give 5 options and you get the results - you now need to narrow it down and vote on the two that are the most favored (just like they do in elections).

If the board does not go by the vote of the parents to stay traditional - why did we even have a survey?
So I hope someone makes a motion on the board to have traditional (parents) vs modified lite (staff) to take another survey with only these two. The surveys can be given to the students at the beginning of school next year and returned to the school and collected. The survey results should be at least 50% return.

If this is too long to wait - the survey should be sent to the homes of the students with one count per student living at the address. Again - survey results should be over 50% return.

I realize this will not happen because someone will say this costs too much or this would be another delay - even though spending on other items is far more and WHAT IS THE RUSH? Could be by the vote Pleasanton will not be changing.

Also, Mark commented that teachers should only TEACH what parents want. That was not the subject of this article. I have great respect for teachers and hope they would teach what is quality literature.


Posted by Clarity, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 8:01 am

Agree with Figures Don't Lie, however, Modified Lite shouldn't even be part of the run-off, since that option received the third-highest percentage of votes. I'd still like to see the full survey results. Just like the district didn't trust parents to vote honestly (hence the need for student IDs), I don't trust the district to report the results truthfully.

Nor, incidentally, do I think it was fair to NOT include data from incoming K parents as well as those who will enter K during the 2015-16 school year. Similarly, it's not right to include data from parents of juniors and seniors, since their children will graduate before the changes are implemented.


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore
on Jun 17, 2014 at 8:12 am

If you want a shorter calendar year get yourself a pair of scissors and clip awayu!

that or take off a week early...nobody cares anyways...


Posted by resident, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 8:14 am

You can also argue that 55% don't want a week off in October. Where's the data on 2nd and 3rd preferences? Without the full survey results you can't get an accurate picture.


Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Jun 17, 2014 at 8:16 am

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

If you are asked to rank from X number and the highest ranking, in this case, is traditional, then that is the number one choice, albeit by less than a majority. I don't know if the original questions were asked in a way to get at the intended result. Were you asked to rank the choices 1-5 with one being the best or were you asked to choose just one or were you asked what you could live with? And how many responders were there?

As to saying 65% chose a modification of one kind or another, when you pick one of those four options, you could have as many as 90% of the responders unhappy with the choice (assuming the lowest choice of 10%). If this is intended for the 15-16 school year, there is time to consider what data you have vs what you might need to clarify.


Posted by Jill, a resident of Carlton Oaks
on Jun 17, 2014 at 8:41 am

And all of this is why, had I been a school board member, I wouldn't have wanted to do a parent survey. As I, at least, expected, it didn't result in any clear-cut answer, and now we have calls for more surveys that will only drag out the process. Whatever happens, you're going to wind up with some unhappy parents.

We elect the school board members to make decisions in what they see as the best interest of the students. Let them do that. If you don't like what the board members do, then choose your votes accordingly in the next election.


Posted by Bigger picture, a resident of Amador Estates
on Jun 17, 2014 at 9:02 am

If the parents in this community could stop thinking about themselves and look at the bigger picture, they'd realize that a calendar change is a no brainier. Studies have shown that students learn better in shorter increments (with short breaks inbetween), there are less focusing issues, behavior is better therefore having less discipline issues. Aside from those benefits, there is a big one for high schoolers, the semester should end before winter break begins. It is ridiculous that students have to go back in January after a two week break and take finals another two weeks later. Regardless if you have an elementary, middle or high school student (I have one of each) this is a benefit to all! Parents have too much of an impact in PUSD. In any other district the dates would've been changed & students would've shown up. Remember, let's do what's best for our kids not the parents!


Posted by Concerned Parent , a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 17, 2014 at 9:07 am

The recent moves by the Pleasanton School Board are an attempt to find a way not to lose revenue from students missing school over the Christmas vacation. If you look at how they have approached the issue it mirrors Vladamir Putin's approach to Crimea. This is a complete sham and disgraceful. It really insults our collective intelligence. Mr. Putin told his troops the result he wanted and by god it happened. We will need to ask for the Superintendents resignation if this passes. She is behind the effort to create a Pleasanton International School that ignores American traditions.


Posted by resident, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 9:07 am

Bill - actually the results show that the majority (55%) do not want a shortened calendar or more time off in the year.


Posted by lll, a resident of Birdland
on Jun 17, 2014 at 9:12 am

Jill, you said "We elect the school board members to make decisions in what they see as the best interest of the students."

That should be true but unfortunately we currently have a majority of the school board (i.e., 3 members) who rubberstamp everything the administration asks for. You are right we need to vote in board members who actually represent the residents and not the school administration and school unions. One school board member has a spouse who is heavily involved in the union so it is obvious how that board member will vote.

Hello community. We MUST have some better members of this community who can do a much better job in representing the residents in the school district. Please run for office for the November election. Do not vote for either of the incumbents in November as those two are just administration rubberstampers.


Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Jun 17, 2014 at 9:19 am

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

Parents don't abdicate their rights by electing representatives. That's true for any elected representative. You must be responsible and accountable to your constituency. Board members are elected to keep a balance of power for the community, otherwise the power swing in favor of those who have all the negotiating right.

So, many things the board must decide on requires input from parents. Surveys are often a necessary part of that process. There is no reason to rush this decision, and perhaps the survey wasn't as comprehensive as it could've been. If the process is not inclusive of all stakeholders, you're going to end up with results where no one is satisfied. Good decision-making by an elected official requires caution and care to achieve the most balanced outcome, particularly in a case involving students and their families


Posted by Resident, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 10:12 am

If they are worried about absences over the christmas break, that will only get worse. Now that students know they don't have any pending work or tests to worry about, families can take longer vacation and miss a few days at the start of the second semester. The same goes for summer...missing a few days or even a week in the beginning? No big deal except for AP students, the rest can miss a few days or even a week. And since most students don't start taking AP classes until 10th grade (the UCs only take into account 4 APs taken in 10-11 grade for admission), all of k-9 can miss the first week of each semester and be just fine. I am curious to learn how many absences there will be in the beginning of each semester. If the board members don't listen when we fill out the survey, why should we listen when they talk to us about money lost due to absences? They have deaf ears? So do we.

We should stop complaining since I doubt the board will listen. I am almost certain they will go with the recommendation of the administration and ignore the parents wishes.


Posted by Steve, a resident of Stoneridge
on Jun 17, 2014 at 10:56 am

For the first time, I agree with Cholo. At least part of what he said.

If you want a longer summer, take your child out of school a week early. It really doesn't matter. Nobody is held back. There isn't summer school.

If you want a longer winter/Christmas break, keep them home longer. No one cares.

The only reason someone might care is because of lost funding. If your child can't read, no problem.


Posted by Jack, a resident of Downtown
on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:42 am

Once again, the alarming piece of this is not the week off in October that nobody wants or needs, it is the process. We get so few glimpses behind the curtain as to how our school district actually works, that when we do, it scares the heck out of us, or upsets us to no end! And this is a perfect example…
We need to hold the board members accountable, and they in turn need to understand that the Superintendent and Staff answer to them…


Posted by out of town, a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 17, 2014 at 12:28 pm

Unfortunately, we are out of town.

Can anyone print this up and give to the board - I have no idea if any of the board reads the comments that have been expressed here.


Posted by reasonable, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 12:56 pm

Why is no one even considering an option that would start in late August, break in December, but offer FEWER days off in November (or offer uneven semesters). If they want another week of vacation, put it in February ("ski week") as many other districts do. Then those with family/camp/employer vacation isses don't miss out on August, and there is still an opportunity to take an off-peak vacation during the year (isn't that what this is all about -- cheaper airfare?). Seems that would really address all of constituents here, but no one is talking about it!

Losing August may seem petty but it is a big deal for many families' vacations, reunions, camping plans, and any extracurricular activities not run by City of Pleasanton.


Posted by reasonable, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 1:12 pm

OK I just looked at the results of the survey. The majority of parents want to keep the traditional calendar, with the second largest group preferring early start/finish -- the option that combines a December break with the least possible impact to summer. How on earth did they derive from these results that "modified lite" would meet most people's objectives?

What I see is that parents want to preserve as much summer (from what I've seen on these boards, this means August not May) with a significant number wanting the December break. Nowhere do I see a majority wanting to get rid of August so you can have lots of mid-year breaks.


Posted by Joe, a resident of Ruby Hill
on Jun 17, 2014 at 1:19 pm

Comments:
-Elementary teachers feel it takes 4-6 weeks after summer to get kids learning grade related material because of the need to review due to the length of summer break (multiply that by 5 years and it's 20-30 weeks of instruction by the time a child is 11.) Wonder why we are behind?
-Finals before the Christmas break would seem to make sense...
-Note to the school board - give parents more than 3 options and see what happens -I get you are trying to be inclusive but sometimes more is not better...
-Note to school board -parents in Pleasanton think the education process is a bit like Burger King (you can figure that one out), as this blog would seem to suggest.


Posted by pleasanton was nice forty years ago, a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 17, 2014 at 2:41 pm

Year round schools would work better. I also think they should get rid of all school related extra activities like sports with some exceptions like band.


Posted by LOL, a resident of Birdland
on Jun 17, 2014 at 3:56 pm

65% of parents want a new calendar schedule. Need I say more? Now, we only need to agree which flavor of the modified schedule we want. Those stats are misrepresented in their current state. Just because the data reflects that 35% of the parents want to keep things as-is only means 65% of the parents want a change.


Posted by Very disappointed, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on Jun 17, 2014 at 4:14 pm

The survey's results are misleading, I believe. One had to cast 3 votes: our 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choice. So, if my 1st choice is TRADITIONAL. That is compiled in that section. But in trying to be fair I did cast my 2nd choice for the EARLY/LATE/START, for example Is that then compiled in that section as a vote?

Are the 1st. 2nd and 3rd choices weighted? I do hope that the statistics behind the pie charts are explained. Because if the 3 choices were just added up in each section, then the survey has NO statistical value, no matter what you want it to show.


Posted by Why isn't it on?, a resident of Amador Estates
on Jun 17, 2014 at 7:21 pm

I can't find the board meeting online or on T.V. Does anyone know the channel or weblink?


Posted by Staff Reporter Amanda Aguilar, a resident of another community
on Jun 17, 2014 at 7:39 pm

Staff Reporter Amanda Aguilar is a registered user.

Why isn't it on?: I'm here at the board meeting, they just announced that it's not being televised and it won't be online right now. It will be available in a few weeks.


Posted by Right, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 7:40 pm

Year round would be best, I agree. But unions and those of there ilk will never permit it. They only want to bilk parents and other citizen tax payers for vacation money. The teachers and other union leeches live high off the hog while people with real jobs have to foot the bill.


Posted by Curious, a resident of Birdland
on Jun 17, 2014 at 7:48 pm

Amanda can you keep us posted?


Posted by Alan Heckman, a resident of Livermore
on Jun 17, 2014 at 8:49 pm

So... Sorry I had to leave early after speaking at the public comments, what else happened?


Posted by Jtjh, a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Jun 17, 2014 at 10:09 pm

So the discussion of an apparently highly controversial issue takes place during the first week that school is not in session and it's not broadcast live.

Well, what a surprise.


Posted by Curious, a resident of Mission Park
on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:02 pm

Tried to catch the live feed, now I know why I could get it. But what happened? Did the board vote or was it deferred?


Posted by What A Sham, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:28 pm

4 to 1 in favor of modified lite - the only option the Board could vote on (other than traditional) without the District having to go back to the collective bargaining process. The Board did ask the District to try get the unions to agree to the Early Start/finish option for 2015/16 so that summer isn't so short in the first year, but that wasn't a contingency of the vote.


Posted by huh?, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:44 pm

Who was the one NO vote?


Posted by What A Sham, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:45 pm

Valerie Arkin


Posted by Yeah!!!, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:45 pm

Thanks for the report . . . this is GREAT news!!!


Posted by Idiots should be recalled, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:58 pm

The majority of parents want to keep the traditional calendar and the board votes for reducing summer to 9 weeks.

Time to recall the board (except for Arkin who seems to be the only one that listens to the voters).


Posted by What A Sham, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 18, 2014 at 12:06 am

Chris Grant wasn't even at the meeting for the District presentation or public comments. They took a break to wait for his return and vote.


Posted by Be Positive, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 18, 2014 at 12:36 am

Kathleen builds distrust in PUSD because parents arent polled.
Parents get polled per her wishes, now tcehe poll isnt good enough, worded right, font incorrect, right language....notice-> target....moved, as expected from her. Like clockwork.

Valeria Arkin voted apart from the others, again, predictable- it's not because that's what is best for students, but what is best for her election votes. Another no surprise.

Imagine if you all put this exuberant energy, passion, and opinions to work alongside the educated professionals in our schools...do you believe it would improve our district? Or is it better that we build distrust, complain, and spread conspiracy theories...is that improving the education here? Does it make you feel better?


Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger, a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Jun 18, 2014 at 1:10 am

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

51 comments and I'm the problem? First, I was responding to Jill, so I didn't move the target. I said "perhaps" because I couldn't take the survey (and didn't expect to be able to do so). 18% marked modified lite as one of their choices and yet 4 board members read that as a ringing endorsement. I don't have to build distrust, the governance team covers that base all on their own. As to working with that team, I tried. Oh, and I acknowledged the survey and thanked the staff for it on an older thread. By the way, I supported a calendar with finals before winter break and no October break and only one week in spring. You missed that on the other thread as well.


Posted by Right, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 18, 2014 at 4:53 am

Whoa! Kathleen don't let the union shills put you in a bad light. They get paid to do that year round. Everybody distrusts the board and the administration and the supervisor and the teachers as well because everybody knows there all nothing but union sock puppets. You, with your clear language, dole out the truth like nobody else. Without a doubt there is a majority of distrust among all parents, and I thank you for telling it like it is. The whole poll is tainted with biased, and a close reading shows the need to recall the entire board, fire the supervisor, and get rid of the union that pulls their strings. Only then can we then move away from the unconstitutionality of union power and tenured teachers.


Posted by Not over yet, a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 18, 2014 at 7:57 am

Live Free or Keep your kids out of school in August, . . .
Based on the survey results, it appears to me that parents really value those traditional August vacation days. For those parents concerned about their children's retention over the summer there are enrichment programs they can choose to enroll their children in.
How does the Pleasanton School District plan to deal with high absenteeism and the cost to the school district if the parents that didn't choose this option do not feel compelled to give up their family reunions, traditional vacation, etc????
Just saying, . . . there is a cost to every choice and I'm not paying for this one.


Posted by Laverne, a resident of Castlewood
on Jun 18, 2014 at 8:16 am

4 out of 5 board members voted for Modified Lite. Next summer will work out to be 7 weeks long, then the following year will be 9 weeks long.
Remember…they wouldn't guarantee they will not modify again within 2 years..so who really knows what will become of summer for kids in Pleasanton.
Best thing we can do…vote them all outta here in the fall, except Valerie Arkin...she always listens to the parents & does what she thinks is best for kids, families, Pleasanton & not the unions. Chris Grant is the opposite.



Posted by Concerned, a resident of Val Vista
on Jun 18, 2014 at 8:55 am

Simply amazing, just like Zone 7. Lies after lies. A few people in Pleasanton can ruin a beautiful city and government. God Bless Ed Kinney for his service to this city and he would be amazed how it is turning. I am sure someone will be offended because I said "God bless"


Posted by Pleasanton was nice forty years ago, a resident of Del Prado
on Jun 18, 2014 at 9:48 am

Yea for ED! Loved him. He would tell us a team joke before every game back in the 70s at Amador


Posted by East Side, a resident of Stoneridge Park
on Jun 18, 2014 at 10:04 am

35% is not a majority, especially with 5 options. If you sum the Modified options that equates to 45%. 20% wanted a early/start finish. This means that 65% are in favor of some change with includes starting as early as early/mid August.


Posted by Betty, a resident of Birdland
on Jun 18, 2014 at 1:44 pm

Thank you to the parents who got the word out here on the Weekly. I know you pushed hard to get that done & get the survey done. At least ..because of your pressure, they didnt chose one of the more extreme modifications.
Of course they may still go there. I was at a meeting where a parent asked if they will modify again in a couple years, and Mr McCoy said ...there is a chance, and that "he could not guarentee they will not modify again."
Thank you again for letting me & many parents know about this calendar change.


Posted by Shadow, a resident of Birdland
on Jun 18, 2014 at 4:43 pm

Thank you What a Sham for posting the results. I was unable to find them the districts web site-not a surprise, really.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

‘Much Ado’ or is it Adios for ObamaCare?
By Tom Cushing | 33 comments | 1,102 views

Political posturing about water
By Tim Hunt | 4 comments | 787 views

Backpacked with care is back
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 489 views