The governor touts his $68 billion boondoggle | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | PleasantonWeekly.com |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

The governor touts his $68 billion boondoggle

Uploaded: Jan 8, 2015

When it comes to the environment, the sometimes pragmatic Gov. Jerry Brown seems to check his brain before deciding policy.
Several examples from his inaugural speech this week:
? In his remarks, he called out "the menace of air pollution." That was curious wording given that the air in California, with the exception of the lower San Joaquin Valley, is remarkably cleaner than it was when he was a boy growing up in Los Angeles. There have been dramatic advances in pollution control as technology has improved and regulators have a free hand to impose whatever they believe will improve air quality—witness the wood burning bans in the Bay Area.
? He must hate fossil fuels, although wisely he has refused to ban hydraulic fracking in the state. He raised the goal for renewable electrical power (which omits hydro power from dams) to 50 percent. What it does to the cost of power—already sky high when compared to other states—he chooses not to address. Wind power, without subsidies, works in a few places, but cannot be counted upon as other than a supplemental source. The roof-top solar systems are prudent investments and should be able to pay off without heavy government subsidies.
? He took great pride in the ceremonial start for the $68 billion high-speed rail that moved no dirt—that's because it is far from ready to go, but there is a deadline from the feds to spend the money by 2017. The state was supposed to have broken ground in 2012 (remember shovel-ready projects that the president touted in 2009 when he was signing the absurdly expensive, pork-filled stimulus billed that the Democrats in Congress sent to his desk.) The state is up against that deadline and with Republicans controlling both houses of Congress, there will be little wiggle room, particularly if there's a Republican in the White House in 2017.
? The problems with the high-speed rail would fill a book and there are still plenty of legal challenges ahead as well as purchasing the right-of-way. It's been far more difficult to find willing sellers in the San Joaquin Valley than anticipated—wait until they try to do it in populated areas. There still is $47 billion of money that has not been identified even after the state Legislature allocated 25 percent of cap-and-trade funds to the choo-choo. That's a very questionable use as well and the revenues from the eight auctions to date have not been great. That will increase now that the state air board has decreed that oil products are subject to the tax—a decision that will raise gasoline prices from 10 cents to perhaps as much as 30 to 40 cents per gallon. When prices have plummeted, that will not sting now—40 more cents on $4 hurts.
? Perhaps the biggest issue is that high-speed rail doesn't even qualify as a "nice to have" infrastructure in California. We have huge needs for road maintenance and expansion and this is simply a huge waste of money—you can extend BART to Livermore, east Contra Costa and ring the Bay for 10-15 percent of the cost of the high-speed system. High speed rail works in Europe because of its relatively compact cities with highly developed public transit systems stemming from hubs in downtown rail stations. Try getting around the Los Angeles basin by public transit or the Bay Area beyond downtown San Francisco and downtown Oakland.
There were thoughtful stories in a number of the dailies that are worth reading for additional details—particularly the San Francisco Examiner and Bay Area News Group (Sunday).

Comments

 +   1 person likes this
Posted by BART does not intend to go to Livermore, a resident of Livermore,
on Jan 8, 2015 at 9:32 am

Much less to serve San Joaquin Valley.
That's why they let their Right of Way in 580 become Lexus Lanes.
And why they tried to sell off the Livermore parking lots, too.

But they have been taking Livermore's money, both sales and property taxes for over 40 years.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Formerly Dan from BC, a resident of Bridle Creek,
on Jan 8, 2015 at 8:30 pm

Formerly Dan from BC is a registered user.

Its simply odd to me that there are those on this forum who have argued for this train and they are curiously missing from this discussion.

Where are you boys/girls?

Tim,

I tend to read a lot of the national opinion mags and quite a few out-of-state legal and technical blogs and note that most outside of this state can see the train as the boondoggle that it is. It absolutely perplexes me how some inside California, seeing the SAME DATA that you, me, and all those out-of-staters see, STILL push for this monstrosity to be built!

You just have to scratch your head!

Sincerely.


 +   2 people like this
Posted by Bill, a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows,
on Jan 11, 2015 at 1:03 pm

Adding a third lane to either side of interstate 5 would cost a tiny fraction of high speed rail, employ thousands, and would immeasurably be more beneficial than high speed rail.
Who in their right mind would sit on a train going only 200mph that makes many stops versus flying on a jetliner that goes 500+mph and will get you to your destination 3 times faster? Plus when you land at the airport you have 50+ years of infrastructure that supports the flying public. On a train you end up in SF or downtown LA, now what?
High speed rail is NOT high tech. It is low tech compared with modern jetliners. The taxpayers are on the hook for billions and billions of dollars for this grown-up version of a Lionel train set.


 +   2 people like this
Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Jan 12, 2015 at 12:20 pm

I luv train rides and for that reason I'm not going to complain!

If I'm alive when it's completed, we will all take a fun ride and have a great ole senior time! HOORAY! GORA!

Send me your MONEY! and I will make your reservations. Just put a few hundred dollars in a brown paper bag and drop it off by a tree that you I like to talk about! C-u-on the tracks!



Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:

Follow this blogger (Receive an email when blogger makes a new post)

SUBMIT

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Buyer Beware! The Ethics of College Essay Workshops
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 862 views

Johnny Be Gone – Long Live Rock-n-Roll
By Tom Cushing | 1 comment | 526 views

 

2017 guide to summer camps

Looking for something for the kids to do this summer, learn something new and have fun? The 2017 Summer Camp Guide features local camps for all ages and interests.

Find Camps Here