Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

The right call on the Eastside plan

Uploaded: Mar 11, 2014
Four members of the Pleasanton City Council made the right call last week when they decided to continue planning what should happen on the east side of the community.
Senior city staff brought the question to the council because the urgency that everyone thought was driving the plan has faded. After the court-required rezoning last year, the city had plenty of parcels zoned for higher density housing to meet the state requirements over the next cycle that ends in 2023.
That said, there is no reason to waste 18 months of work by the citizens' task force to say nothing of the time and money spent on staff and consultant time and the partially finished environmental impact plan. The base plan, which can be adjusted, called for 2,279 housing units (both single-family and higher density). The 1,100-acre area has about 400 acres that could be suitable for development—the rest is former gravel pits that have been turned over to the Zone 7 water agency.
Completing the plan is the critical to developing a better circulation plan between Santa Rita and El Charro roads. For instance, traffic options on the south side of Livermore have improved greatly since Highway 84 was connected to I-580 and Jack London Boulevard extended west to connect with Stoneridge Drive at El Charro.
What's missing is the alternative from I-580 that splits the difference between Highway 84 and Santa Rita—the El Charro link and arterials that presumably connect with it (Stoneridge already does; Busch Road likely should).
To plan well, the variety of land uses need to be considered as well as how to maintain needed services like the trash transfer station.
Mayor Jerry Thorne observed that the city is "very divided" on the issue and suggested that developing a plan and then submitting it to the voters may be an alternative. I buy developing a plan, but council members need to do their job—every plan does not need voter approval—that is what elections are for.

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Understanding Early Decision in College Admissions
By Elizabeth LaScala | 1 comment | 1,395 views

New heights for NIMBYs
By Tim Hunt | 18 comments | 888 views

When those covering the news become the news
By Gina Channell-Allen | 0 comments | 825 views