Local Blogs

The Observer

By Roz Rogoff

E-mail Roz Rogoff

About this blog: In January 2002 I started writing my own online "newspaper" titled "The San Ramon Observer." I reported on City Council meetings and other happenings in San Ramon. I tried to be objective in my coverage of meetings and events, and...  (More)

View all posts from Roz Rogoff

Shorten the string

Uploaded: Jan 26, 2012
Some of my readers might recall that two years ago I went on a Progresso Soup diet as part of a makeover contest from the Progresso Soup Company. I didn't win the contest, but I managed to drop 50 lbs in the 6 months I stayed on it.

My goal, in addition to winning the contest which wasn't all that important to me (a woman who lost 150 lbs won) was to lose 25 lbs for my 50th High School Reunion in October. I lost almost double that amount and weighed 226 lbs. at the reunion.

I was chubby in High School but never close to 200 lbs. I weighed between 150-160 and wore a size 13 or 15. I wasn't the fattest girl in school, but one woman who was heavier than I in high school was considerably lighter at the reunion.

I started over eating again a month or two before I left for Maine and New Rochelle, and I continued to eat during the trip. When I returned I had gained back 5 lbs, then 10 lbs, then 15 lbs, and after a year I had gained back 20 lbs of the 50 I lost.

So I started a soup diet again at the beginning of this year. Since January 3, 2012 I've dropped about 6 lbs. I find it relatively easy to cut down on my eating in the winter months, and I have concluded without any scientific research, that humans are designed to eat and store fat as a protection against starvation when food isn't easily available.

What is often branded as compulsive eating in obese people is really a primitive form of survival. To try to make an obese person "eat sensibly" all year round, is to go against every instinct we have. I have, at times, forced myself to eat everything in sight even when I'm full, to be sure nothing goes to waste. Being able to store food on my body as fat is a guarantee I would not starve during the lean times.

The problem with this now is there are no lean times. The obesity epidemic in America is caused by the abundance and easy access to too much food. So I am going to venture my solution to the obesity problem from my own personal experience and a lifetime of self-scrutiny.

Fat people are told we must "eat sensibly" to control our weight, by people who dictate how those of us who are not like them are supposed to behave. They tell us not to "yo-yo," meaning gaining and losing weight on cyclical basis, but yo-yo'ing is exactly what we are programmed to do – store fat, use fat, store fat, use fat. Humans are designed to yo-yo, or at least my group of humans. We eat as much as we can to store the fat for the lean time. If there's never a lean time, we keep getting fatter and never use it up.

That's why yo-yo'ing is so important. Most people whose weight fluctuates + or – 20 lbs every year do this naturally. You go up a size or two, and diet for a couple of months, and drop back down. Then after six to eight months, it's time to drop those 20 lbs again. Don't let any of those thin freaks tell you this is wrong.

My mother used to yo-yo the same 40 lbs most of her life. She's 96 now, and keeps her weight fairly constant at 145 lbs. Yo-yo'ing 40 lbs is a lot. It's probably better to keep it under 30 lbs, which is why I titled this blog "Shorten the string." Obese people like me, let the string grow to 100 or 200 lbs, and then it is too long to yo-yo.

I lost 150 lbs. in two yo's between 1989 and 1991. I got down to 150 and looked gorgeous for a few years. I know that's hard to believe but I have photos to prove it. I kept most of the weight off for about five years and then gradually gained it back until I hit 250 and then 280.

Despite the prediction that obese people gain it all back and more, I never went all the way back to 300. I dropped from 280 to 275 and now I'm 240. If I yo-yo 30 or 40 lbs. every year, and keep between 220 and 250, that would be better than gaining more. It would be even better if I could inch down an additional 10 or 20 lbs. each year that I don't gain back, so I could get under 200 (I'd be happy at 210), and then yo-yo between 200 and 230.

So I'm hauling in the string on my yo-yo and hoping to keep it shorter each year. My 96-year-old mother is still active and alert. So for me yo-yo'ing is the best way to maintain my weight when eating means survival and being skinny isn't an option.

Comments

 +  Like this comment
Posted by Tiny Tim, a resident of San Ramon,
on Jan 26, 2012 at 9:51 pm

Roz...I noticed you wanted to run for the San Ramon Sewer District...and lost. Could you please enlighten us as to the health care insurance they receive at our expense? Had you won what would your benefits be? Thanks for letting us know their salaries and bonusus...I feel those of us who pay for this largesse are grateful for your sunshines eforts!...BTW, sorry the good old boys beat you..!
Medical economists tell us obesity and dementia will bankrupt our children. On a larger note (no pun intended) I just returned from Atlanta and and in my flight 6 rows had a conflict amongst "large people" who were occupying 2 seats given their size. This was a flight fom New York to SFO and this needs to be addressed. The medically certifiably OBESE folks could care less about their seatmates and felt we all had to be warmed by their fat thighs touching ours for 5 hours. GROSS...


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Roz Rogoff, the San Ramon Observer,
on Jan 26, 2012 at 10:22 pm

Roz Rogoff is a registered user.

Tim,

Since you are Tiny you probably could share a seat with a fat person, but I always buy two. I prefer having my space and not intrude on anyone else's.

As for DSRSD it was the "Good old girls" who beat me, Georgean Vonheeder-Leopold and Dawn Benson. Dawn's been doing a very good job and implemented several of my campaign promises.

As for medical payments for the Directors, it depends on the cost of their coverage. The CC Times public employee database for 2010 listed a high of $18,580 for Dan Scannell to a low of $1,672 for Pat Howard.

Howard is over 65 so he's covered by Medicare. The others are not old enough yet for Medicare. Their annual salary, which is based on the number of meetings they attended, was between $7,500 and $9,500. So you can see they are raking in the dough.

Roz


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Rosa, a resident of San Ramon,
on Jan 28, 2012 at 3:38 pm

Roz, congratulations on the weight loss. I am on the plump side myself and keeping the weight down is tough.

Being overweight is a problem for a lot of us. People who don't have much can still have weight problems because they consume cheap starchy and processed foods. Most of the canned foods like Progresso soup are LOADED with salt.

I read T. Tim's questions about the water company's health insurance costs. I'm for universal health care. Public employees and everyone else should be entitled to med. benefits. Right now a lot of people aren't covered at all or are inadequately insured. It sounds like Mr. Scannel doesn't get med. benefits from his day job. Is he an independent contractor?


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Roz Rogoff, the San Ramon Observer,
on Jan 28, 2012 at 6:11 pm

Roz Rogoff is a registered user.

I believe Mr. Scannell is an independent contractor. I know he travels a lot and attends some meeting via telephone.

Serving on a Board like DSRSD isn't for the money or the benefits. I don't always agree with all of the decisions the Directors make, but I respect their service to the community.

Roz



Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:

Follow this blogger (Receive an email when blogger makes a new post)

SUBMIT

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Vote YES on Measures 45, 46, & 47, NO on 48
By Roz Rogoff | 30 comments | 2,072 views

Prop 47: not perfect, just preferable.
By Tom Cushing | 2 comments | 733 views